Latest Posts

EHRs as platforms

Posted on

Some very interesting trends are occurring in the health IT arena, which raise the question of what role Electronic Health Records (EHR) systems will have in the future. A few years ago, the focus for health care professionals and hospitals was EHR acquisition and implementation, as well as qualification and access to federal incentive money from the EHR Incentive Program (Meaningful Use).

This year, as could be seen in the recent HIMSS conference, the focus was much less on EHR implementation and Meaningful Use – these things were assumed. They were a given. Most hospitals and a majority of clinicians have already moved from paper to EHRs. Instead, the focus has been on other things: (1) patient engagement, (2) actual interoperability of data (not just at the high institution-to-institution level, but in the trenches at the point of care, whether you’re in an institution or not), and (3) analytics, with a subset of that being population health management – critically important as we move into an era of ACOs and value-based compensation.

Of particular interest to me were businesses that provide alternative chart-note capture and other data input methods which ride as a layer on top of already-installed EHRs. In essence, they provide an alternate user interface (UI) for an EHR that intrinsically has bad UI. I was struck not so much by what such companies are, but more by what this means.

The anatomy of an EHR
It is useful to think of a modern EHR as having several elements: (1) there is a UI layer, which is the default interface for entering and viewing patient data into the system; (2) there is the data layer; (3) there is the analytics layer, usually presented as a collection of in-EHR reports; (4) and there is the patient portal, which connects to the data layer and presents patient-facing views, much like the EHR UI presents professional-facing views of that data.EHR anatomy

Let’s look at each of these elements to see where current and emerging health IT products fit in, and what that means for the future of EHRs

The EHR “default” UI
EHRs present a “default” UI to the user. Much has been said, and much has been criticized about how such UI interfaces exist with vendors today. The biggest complaints are that they slow down workflow, and result in taking 30 minutes to do a task that used to take 10 minutes. Or, worse yet, they take 15 minutes to do something you never had to do before at all.

Vendors face the difficult challenge of trying to have either a “one size fits all” UI, or a configurable and adaptive one that may address certain roles or needs. The problem is that there are more workflow and use-case needs than a vendor can ever hope to anticipate. After all, health care is local. Health care trends are national, driven largely by policy, or are regional, driven largely by market. But health care delivery itself is local. As a result, there will always be local-provider needs that are poorly addressed by the default UI of any given EHR. Rule of thumb: if you have to create a work-around to do something that is done poorly by your EHR, then you have a UI failure. And everyone who uses EHRs will eventually develop their own work-arounds.

This is where an emerging sector of business comes in – layering on a more-efficient, better UI for specific use cases. An EHR vendor that allows such specific UI plug-ins will do well. It will augment the user experience. Those that don’t will lag until they either fail or eventually give in to the irresistible trend.

The data layer
The EHR UI, perhaps supplemented by specific use-case add-ons, creates and interacts with the data. Typically, this data has been local, housed within the institution that created it. And, as has been amply addressed in the literature, the fragmentation of this patient data around institutional silos remains a problem.

Another emerging trend in health IT, not surprisingly, is the effort to link together all the data sources where they exist, creating globally patient-centric (rather than institution-centric) aggregated data. There are data-aggregation efforts around enterprise / institutional data, and similar efforts around ambulatory data.  Products that support effective transition of care create and are built on data feeds from multiple siloed sources.

Another domain to consider, outside EHR-created data, will be consumer (or PHR) created data. This can come from direct patient (consumer) input, or, more likely, from connection to wearable devices. Wearable devices are an emerging market, which is making explosive growth. Integrating such data feeds into one place, and linking them with health data derived from EHRs is a very interesting area of growth, of which we have barely scratched the surface and realize its full impact.

The analytics layer
Looking at EHR-generated data, currently mostly locked up in the institutional silos that created them, there are analytics tools that can extract important reports and insights for a variety of audiences. EHRs tend to have a collection of reports built in them. But, again, it is not possible for any vendor to anticipate all the locally-important reporting that a hospital, medical group, ACO or individual medical practice will need. Things come up ad-hoc, and reports need to be created from the data that is there which are not part of the “off the shelf” reports that come with the EHR.

A whole new crop of businesses are emerging which do sophisticated data analytics around specific use-cases. The needs for reporting gaps in care, or clinical quality metric reporting, or utilization and cost insights around populations being managed by risk-taking medical organizations – all these things (and more, of course) are addressed by very inventive companies that can dig into the data and report on things that really matter.

And when the data sources that these analytics companies tap into become aggregated, cross-institutional data – perhaps including device-generated or patient-generated data as well – then the value derived becomes truly extraordinary.

The patient-facing portal
Most modern EHRs contain a patient-facing portal which allow a patient to log in and see a view of their data from the institutional place where the data is found. If care is being sought from an integrated delivery system (IDS), where the hospital, the health plan, and all the associated physicians are all on a unified enterprise chart, there is a valuable patient portal that is popular among consumers.

But for most people, care is sought in multiple settings with separate EHR systems, which may change over one’s lifetime. The fragmented picture of one’s health story becomes evident, and each place offers the patient a separate log-in to see segments of their story. “Portal overload” will eventually cause patients to throw their hands in the air and not use any of them, except for maybe just a few.

Another emerging trend, then, is the unified patient portal, which attempts to connect in a virtual way with every place where patient engagement is offered, so that there is a single sign-on, single UI place to view all of one’s data. New companies are making headway in this arena also.

So what will the future role of EHRs be?
If, as we have seen, that the native UI of EHRs is supplemented by improved UI add-ons that address specific use-cases, and data becomes aggregated across institutions and moves to the cloud, and analytics are done by specific companies that can cull data needed for specific ongoing and ad-hoc needs, and patient portals become aggregated into universal places – where does that leave EHRs?

The role of EHRs, in my opinion, will be around in-office or in-hospital workflow optimization. The EHR should be one built to easily allow specific add-ons to supplement their native UI, and therefore make the user (the care professional) more efficient, not less efficient as is sadly often the case now.

The basic structure of the EHR needs to be around workflows, and how to make them better. Gone should be the days when the expectation was that clinicians (“users”) would need to adapt themselves to do things the way the EHR was built – this paradigm needs to be turned on its head. EHRs should adapt to the workflows that exist, and offer shortcuts and improvements that allow all users to function “at the top of their licensure.”

An EHR vendor that creates the API linkages to “work well with others” will succeed. The native UI needs to allow other external apps to augment the experience and allow for better user experience. The data created needs to be sharable with external aggregated repositories. The data needs to allow external analytics companies to provide the supplemental reporting that is beyond what comes “in the box.” And the data needs to be able to interface with aggregated patient portals so that patient engagement can reach its potential.

This is a different role, and a different vision for EHRs in the future. It has happened in other industries, and will happen in healthcare as well. Those vendors that welcome this will do well. Those that resist will become dinosaurs, or (to use a popular Silicon Valley term) become zombies (companies that only stay alive by eating resources around them, but die once the investment dries up).

Healthcare is an ecosystem. So is health IT.

More Latest Posts

When do physicians behave like consumers?

Posted on

We are seeing a flood of health IT tools come in to the market, some simple and some highly complex. The way that physicians approach the adoption of these tools has major implications for vendors. Electronic Health Records (EHR) systems have been the centerpiece of health IT for a number of years, and now a   …Continue Reading

What is the future of EHRs?

Posted on

Electronic Health Records (EHRs) have come a long way in moving U.S. healthcare onto an electronic platform in the past few years. As of 2013, the majority of practicing community physicians, as well as most hospitals, have adopted an EHR system in their practices. Like was the case with paper beforehand, EHRs have maintained the   …Continue Reading

Value based healthcare payments – what kind of IT is needed?

Posted on

The trend toward value based payment for healthcare services is gaining momentum. For better or for worse, we have paid for health care in the U.S. on a fee-for-service basis – from the perspective of providers (doctors, hospitals, etc.), that means that the more you do, the more you make. Except for efforts around managed   …Continue Reading

Patient centered data is the best solution for “meaningful consent”

Posted on

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) recently released guidelines to address the question of consent when it comes to electronic health information exchange (eHIE) – “meaningful consent.” This is a helpful effort, and underscores the difficulty of obtaining, documenting, and implementing consent in the modern ever-more-complex world of electronic health information.   …Continue Reading

Rethinking health information exchange

Posted on

We have come a long way, in the past several years, in our efforts to bring health care data into the modern era of electronic connectivity. Yet, the entirety of one’s health story is still fragmented into a variety of data silos that are largely organization-centric. Through the efforts of many very talented people, spurred   …Continue Reading

Patient centered health IT as the solution to universal health identifiers

Posted on

The effort to build health IT products that are patient-facing, and able to pull together all the health information about oneself into one unified dashboard, is well underway. It is the inevitable next step in the evolution of health care data – putting patients at the center of their own data, and having them be   …Continue Reading

Patient-generated health information is the future of healthcare

Posted on

“Patient engagement” has certainly become a buzz-word in the realm of modern health IT. Medical practitioners as well as hospitals hope to encourage patients to interact with them using on-line tools, and Stage 2 Meaningful Use criteria (which go into effect beginning in 2014) require that at least 5% of a clinical practice’s patients actually   …Continue Reading

Identity verification is key for successful implementation of Direct

Posted on

Health Information Technology is on the threshold of a significant step forward. Up until now, most of the emphasis in health IT was encouraging physicians and other ambulatory providers, as well as hospitals, to move off paper and onto an electronic platform. EHR adoption has increased significantly from 2008, where only about 4% of physicians   …Continue Reading

Can patient engagement be achieved from a clinician messaging system?

Posted on

For clinicians participating in the federal EHR Incentive Program (Meaningful Use), Stage 2 of Meaningful Use (MU2) is right around the corner (2014). No one yet has EHR software that is certified for MU2, given that vendors are just becoming certified this year. So, from a clinician perspective, it is hard to imagine how using   …Continue Reading

Two-year EHR analysis now available

Posted on

Newly released federal data has allowed analysis of the EHR Incentive Program (Meaningful Use) based on two years of data. First-year users, both from 2011 and 2012, as well as second-year users (who started in 2011) can now be studied. A new comprehensive analysis is now available, and can be downloaded for review. This document   …Continue Reading

Trends in EHR vendor strength

Posted on

New data from CMS allows comparison of EHRs used for Meaningful Use. Shifts in market footprint by EHR vendors from 2011 to 2012 can now be analyzed.

The riddle of adoption of consumer PHRs

Posted on

Next-generation Personal Health Records (PHRs) are starting to emerge. We review the evolution of these and look at different ways to build PHR adoption.

Paperwork in an EHR-enabled medical office

Posted on

Electronic Health Records (EHR) systems come with the vision of eliminating paper in a medical practice. “No more paper” is the rallying cry of many an EHR company. But is this the case? As it turns out, not really. Stacks of legible, computer-generated paper still pile up on a medical practitioner’s desk, despite having an   …Continue Reading

The art of population management

Posted on

The term “population management” has become one of the buzzwords of modern health care. Medical practices as well as larger delivery organizations, such as medical groups, IPAs, ACOs, and PCMHs, are being asked to report on their performance around managing the health of assigned populations. Performance-based compensation, in fact, hinges on measuring and comparing groups   …Continue Reading

Healthcare collaboration and PHRs in 2013

Posted on

With the beginning of 2013, health IT is facing a new set of challenges. Electronic Health Record (EHR) vendors are gearing up for Stage 2 Meaningful Use certification, which includes more emphasis on interoperability – the sharing of health data about a patient across different health settings – and on patient engagement. Health care is   …Continue Reading

The role of PHRs in Medication Reconciliation

Posted on

Medication Reconciliation, keeping track of all a patient’s medications from all soruces, is a big challenge. Universal PHRs can be very significant here.

Free-standing PHRs and Stage 2 Meaningful Use

Posted on

In the upcoming year, Electronic Health Record companies will be challenged to enhance their products in anticipation of Stage 2 Meaningful Use. Stage 2 is right around the corner, and will begin in 2014 for those who have already started their EHR usage in 2011 or 2012 (for those who start Meaningful Use later, Stage   …Continue Reading

Do doctors resist health information exchange with patients?

Posted on

Health technology tools are rapidly emerging, a swirling rising tide of products (web and mobile applications) addressing countless niche issues in the very complex healthcare ecosystem. Two countervailing sources of such efforts characterize the modern landscape – products that come from the consumer Internet side, and products that come from the healthcare provider (and payer)   …Continue Reading

PHRs: what problem are we trying to solve?

Posted on

“Patient engagement” is one of the buzzwords in health policy these days, and substantial data exist to show that when patients are actively engaged with the health care system, particularly if they have a chronic medical condition, their resulting health outcomes are better. Clearly, it’s a good thing for people to be involved in their   …Continue Reading

HIEs are not just for EHRs anymore

Posted on

Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) are hubs where different parts of the healthcare system can exchange information with each other. Doctors can communicate with other doctors, with hospitals, with labs, etc. Funding that encouraged the creation and maturation of HIEs were part of the 2009 American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA), just like Meaningful Use was   …Continue Reading

Modern PHRs beyond Meaningful Use

Posted on

Patient-facing health IT has come a long way, but is also poised to make another significant leap forward. Last week, the final rules for Stage 2 Meaningful Use were released, and even though these rules address what physicians and hospitals must do to receive incentive payments for demonstrating “meaningful use of certified healthcare technology,” some   …Continue Reading

The changing health care environment, and what it means for health IT

Posted on

Health care is changing. It is doing so in a profound, organizational way. I’m not talking about the advent of new technologies – diagnostics, therapeutics and information technology – I’m talking about how doctors and hospitals are organized. The tradition in this country is that health care has been delivered mainly by individual, self-employed physicians   …Continue Reading

The looming policy struggle for Meaningful Use

Posted on

The federal EHR Incentive Program (Meaningful Use) is based on the presumption that once a medical practitioner has adopted an Electronic Health Record (EHR) system, that system will remain in use for subsequent years. More specifically, the presumption is that once a clinician attests to Meaningful Use (the first year of attestation only needs a   …Continue Reading

Meaningful Use 2012 mid-year report card

Posted on

The mid-year data on the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program (Meaningful Use) has been released, allowing further insight into adoption of EHRs. The current year-to-date Meaningful Use attestation figures can be compared to 2011 data, and can illustrate vendor-specific trends in adoption. A few points about Meaningful Use need to be made here. All   …Continue Reading

The three legs of health IT

Posted on

Health Information Technology (health IT) has been a burgeoning space in the past several years. Partly spurred by federal incentives to clinicians to adopt Electronic Health Records (EHR), investment in companies in this field has flourished. In addition to EHR companies, which are numerous, and which will very likely experience significant shake-out over the next   …Continue Reading

An ACO “heat map”

Posted on

Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) are gaining momentum. These efforts, part of the 2010 Affordable Care Act (recently upheld by the Supreme Court), aim at building voluntary groups of doctors, hospitals and other healthcare providers in order to improve the quality and reduce the cost of health care (at least, to Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries). In December,   …Continue Reading

The biggest challenge for HIE is not technical

Posted on

We are at a time of dramatic change in health care. Not only is the question of health care finance on the table as a hot area of debate, but also the issue of health care delivery is (perhaps more quietly) undergoing big change. And the kinds of health Information Technology needed by the delivery   …Continue Reading

Will there be mass consolidation among EHRs?

Posted on

The number of vendors of Electronic Health Records products seems unsustainable. Stimulated by federal Meaningful Use incentives, plus the irresistible tide of pressures and encouragement from all sides (specialty societies, peers, licensing boards, insurance payers), the uptake of EHRs has been steadily increasing. As a result, large established EHR companies, some of whom have been   …Continue Reading

Comprehensive EHR market analysis now available

Posted on

In response to requests for a thorough analysis of the Electronic Health Record industry, I have spent some time putting together a comprehensive EHR market analysis reference document, based on actual Meaningful Use experience in 2011. This document is now available for purchase and download in a newly-created bookstore. This document is designed to be   …Continue Reading

Big Data in health care – are we there yet?

Posted on

The promise of using “Big Data” from health care has been the focus of many in the health IT community, particularly from academia, as witnessed in the recent Health IT Connect conference. As we move from a paper legacy for healthcare data to a new electronic one, huge amounts of clinical data are being amassed   …Continue Reading